2D vs 3D Finite Element Analysis of Free Span Response in Subsea Pipelines

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Science and technology of Mazandaran, Behshahr, Iran

2 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno,Fisciano, Italy

Abstract

Free-span formation in subsea pipelines, often caused by seabed irregularities, local scour, or differential settlements, poses a significant threat to pipeline integrity through the induction of vortex-induced vibrations (VIV), fatigue damage, and potential structural failure. While two-dimensional (2D) numerical models are widely used in early-stage designs due to their simplicity and computational efficiency, their ability to accurately predict the complex dynamic behavior of pipelines remains limited. In contrast, three-dimensional (3D) models provide a more realistic representation of seabed geometry, pipe-soil interaction, and hydrodynamic loading, albeit at the expense of greater computational resources. This study presents a comparative numerical analysis of subsea pipelines with free spans under both 2D and 3D finite element models using ABAQUS software. Key parameters, including deformed shapes, natural frequencies, and simulation run-times, are extracted and evaluated. The results offer valuable insight into the accuracy and applicability of simplified 2D models for preliminary design purposes, providing engineers with a practical framework for selecting appropriate modeling strategies based on project constraints and performance requirements. The study also lays the groundwork for aligning simplified numerical analyses with international design standards.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Nielsen, F. G., So̸reide, T. H., Kvarme, S. O. VIV Response of Long Free Spanning Pipelines. In: ASME International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering; 2002 June 23–28; Oslo, Norway. p. 121-129. doi:10.1115/omae2002-28075.
  2. Xu, W.-H., Gao, X.-F., Du, J. The prediction on in-line vortex-induced vibration of slender marine structures. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2012; 28: 1303-1308. doi:10.1007/s10409-012-0098-3.
  3. Sumer, B. M. Hydrodynamics around cylindrical strucures. 2nd ed. Singapore (SG): World Scientific Publishing Co; 2006. doi:10.1142/6248.
  4. Charanvarma, S., Shashikala, A. Dynamic Response of Free-span Sub-sea Pipelines under Vortex Induced Vibrations. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014; 567: 228-234. doi:10.4028/scientific.net/AMM.567.228.
  5. Palmer, A. C., King, R. A. Subsea Pipeline Engineering. 2nd ed. Tulsa (OK): PennWell; 2008.
  6. Blevins, R. D. Flow-induced vibration. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1977.
  7. Chakrabarti, S. Handbook of Offshore Engineering. 1st ed. Amsterdam (NL): Elsevier; 2005.
  8. Thomaz, T., Carneiro, D., Ellwanger, G., Nascimento, L., Pereira, S. Application of 2D Finite Element Analysis on Subsea Pipe-Soil Interaction Assessment. In: ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering; 2014; p. 1-9. doi:10.1115/omae2014-24670.
  9. Zhao, E., Dong, Y., Tang, Y., Cui, L. Numerical study on hydrodynamic load and vibration of pipeline exerted by submarine debris flow. Ocean Engineering, 2021; 239: 109754. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109754.
  10. Sharifi, S. M. H., Tasdighi, M. Evaluation of Vortex Induced Vibration Effective Parameters on Free-Span Subsea Pipelines. International Journal Of Coastal, Offshore And Environmental Engineering (ijcoe), 2019; 4: 9-15. doi:10.29252/ijcoe.3.3.9.
  11. Jiang, D., Huang, X., Zhao, D., Yang, H., Tang, G. Fatigue Life Prediction of Submarine Pipelines with Varying Span Length and Position. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2025; 13: 763. doi:10.3390/jmse13040763.
  12. DET NORSKE VERITAS (DNV). DNV-RP-F105: Free Spanning Pipelines. Bærum (NO): DNV; 2021.
  13. Li, Y., Li, Y., Akbar, N. Analysis of vibration of the Euler-Bernoulli pipe conveying fluid by dynamic stiffness method and transfer matrix. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 2020; 8: 172. doi:10.4236/jamp.2020.81013.
  14. Ning, J., Lin, T., Liu, S., Bai, R., Huang, W. Three-dimensional pipeline element formulation for global buckling analysis of submarine pipelines with sleeper. Marine Structures, 2023; 90: 103428. doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103428.
  15. Hwang, W., Lee, J. S. Analytical model for the structural behavior of pipelines during lowering-in. Applied Sciences, 2019; 9: 2595. doi:10.3390/app9132595.
  16. DET NORSKE VERITAS (DNV). DNV-ST-F101: Submarine Pipeline Systems. Bærum (NO): DNV; 2021.
Volume 1, Issue 3
August 2025
Pages 70-79
  • Receive Date: 01 July 2025
  • Revise Date: 14 July 2025
  • Accept Date: 21 July 2025
  • First Publish Date: 21 July 2025